What are top nuke shills up to?

22 12 2016

Earlier we reported
FUKUSHIMA RADIATION ENTERS AMERICAN FOOD CHAIN. NO WORRIES SAYS WOODS HOLE. THE LIES CONTINUE.

Many, many disturbing stories like this (12-14) –
100 tons of dead fish in Indonesia, thousands more in Brazil 12.5 million chickens and ducks culled in South Korea ends another week in paradise bear witness to the carnage around the world from Fukushima radiation.

A Green Road Daily News says
Seaborne Fukushima Radiation Plume Hitting West Coast – How the Media Reported it Dangerously Wrong

And Lamar Smith’s Staff Report Committee on Science, Space, and Technology issues this scathing report yesterday:

U.S. Department of Energy Misconduct Related to the Low Dose Radiation Research Program

  • A. Overview of the Low Dose Radiation Research Program and H.R. 5544, the Low Dose Radiation Research Act of 2014.
  • B. Allegations: Office of Science management and senior DOE employees deliberately withheld information from Congress during the legislative process and removed an agency scientist from federal service for providing complete answers to Committee staff.
  • C. Committee Investigation.

U.S. Department of Energy Misconduct Related to the Low Dose Radiation Research Program by flyingcuttlefish on Scribd

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/334817521/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&access_key=key-hIFvR7zAhQTbeYJDmt4E&show_recommendations=false

orionetLite

We thought we’d check in with 2 of the biggest see-no-evil monkeys in the nuke world, Jay Cullen at U Vic and Ken Buesseler at Woods Hole.

JandK
boatTripJay is gleefully tweeting away, “Nothing to see here” tweets.  He’s thrilled to discover the phrase “fake news”.

Ken is chatty with NPR (TEPCO’s friend) affiliate, Southern Oregon University radio.
http://ijpr.org/post/tests-find-lingering-radiation-japan-our-shores#stream/0

The topic is current status of the US getting hit by radiation from Japan.

He starts right off with bananas. smilieBanana
Then he goes on about radon from the basement.
Here’s a new one:
Cold water from the ocean depths REPELS radiation as it rises!
It saves the west coast coast from radiation harm!
He also dispels the myth the seafood is bad. There’s no bio-accumulation in fish so no worries!
smilieBlueAnd here’s more good news from Ken –
internal ingestion of radiation is no different than a dentist’s x-ray!

whoYagonnaCall

Who is checking the NE Pacific for Fukushima radiation and who is not

NukProct04

Advertisements

Actions

Information

6 responses

22 12 2016
flyingcuttlefish

On low dose radiation,
Dr. Leuren Moret says this,
“Radiation is different. It is very very very complex and there is nothing that it does not touch. Here is an intro on how complex it can be. Just the dose response took over 100 years to finally be accepted as supralinear by the Natl. Acad. Science. I was there when it happened, I mean involved with Dr. John Goffman and low level radiation due to DU exposures. He was so happy when the Natl. Acad. finally accepted his theory.

Radiation has a supralinear effect. The ultralow rad exposures are more damaging per unit of rad than higher level rad exposures per unit. The top right curve below is the supralinear effect. Because the unpaired electrons released along the path of the radiation alpha particle or wave are unbalanced, they steal electrons from the cell causing disfunction. When there is a higher density of radiation present, there is a higher probability that the unpaired electrons will partner up with each, other and not have to steal them from the cell. It took a long time for Dr. Goffman to get the Natl. Acad. Science to accept the supralinear dose response for rad, but they finally did about 50 years later. He was a friend of mine.

So this is a very important first concept to keep in mind and to approach any low level radiation with this as the foundation of the effects.”

(Source – https://www.studyblue.com/notes/note/n/pharmacodyamics/deck/5788562 )

22 12 2016
flyingcuttlefish

Sent in –
“The Low Dose DOE research from 1998 to 2014 was clearly to try to prove that low levels are safe. They couldn’t do it. Thus, they removed Noelle from her job and she whined to Congress.
For purposes of the government waste and nuclear discharges all they need to know is that it is dangerous, period, and should not be released to the environment, which has been known for 60 to 90 years or more. “

22 12 2016
flyingcuttlefish

L.M. adds
“They were hiding the supralinear effect because it means that ultra-low levels of radiation are MUCH MORE DANGEROUS per unit of rad than much higher levels. That means that DU, nuke plants, x-rays, medical radiation, etc. are all much worse exposures per unit than much higher levels.”

22 12 2016
flyingcuttlefish

and . . . .
“The danger of radiation was known by 1919. ”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Joseph_Muller

22 12 2016
The Petkau Effect And Low Dose Radiation | SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary

[…] Via flyingcuttlefish  Radiation has a supralinear effect. The ultralow rad exposures are more damaging per unit of rad than higher level rad exposures per unit. The top right curve below is the supralinear effect. Because the unpaired electrons released along the path of the radiation alpha particle or wave are unbalanced, they steal electrons from the cell causing disfunction.  […]

23 12 2016
Trowbridge H. Ford

Thanks, L.M.

The radiation from Lake Karachay is an excellent example of what you determined.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: