Unisex and hermaphrodites may very well be one and the same or at least related. In wildlife and human populations there are scientific reports of changes in reproductive organs, sex ratios, and fertility, and at the same time as these changes nuclear bomb testing (1952-1963) huge releases of highly radioactive nanoparticles (tiny particles that are so small they form a gas) have been released into the atmosphere and are completely mixed in the global atmosphere in one year. There have also been large releases of additional nuclear materials from nuke plants, nuke disasters – Chernobyl, 3 mile island etc., the DU wars (Iraq and Afghanistan etc.), nuke labs (Hanford, Los Alamos, Livermore, Idaho Engineering Lab, Oak Ridge etc., etc.), and until Fukushima – the largest nuclear polluter of the oceans was the Sellafield (Windscale) reprocessing plant in Cumbria, England. The Cumbria operation resulted in the deaths of 25 million babies in India alone.
After years of research on Cumbria, I concluded from many kinds of evidence, that Cumbria was used as a source of nuclear materials that were dumped daily into the Irish Sea and flowed south into the Atlantic ocean to be used as a tracer for scientists to study ocean currents – and this was in preparation for the Fukushima disaster.
One of the early studies on changes in reproduction was from observations of changes in salmon and fresh water otters in the Columbia River which is loaded with radioactive materials from Hanford nuclear weapons plant dumping it into the Columbia river. Not only were male and female reproductive cells found mixed together (hermaphrodite) in the tissues of salmon in the Columbia river, but the sex ratios of male to female salmon in populations in the river demonstrated a constantly expanding female population and shrinking male population. The fresh water otters also had reproductive problems, smaller and fragile penis bones that sometimes broke during mating, and some of the males seemed to not know how to mate (hormone damage).
Another example of this phenomenon has been reported in humans, such as participants in the Olympics. A gold medal runner from S. Africa was tested for sex, a standard test at the Olympics, and she was marginal on certain hormones, so a physical examination was done on her. She had a vagina but the two cells that form testes in men or ovaries in women, had developed as testes in her but had not descended from her internal cavity. She was allowed to keep her gold medals but the Olympic committee decided that she had to race with the male athletes in future competitions. The Olympic committee also eliminated the sex test from Olympic competition requirements.
Yet another example of changes in sex and reproduction are the studies on polar bears in the Arctic where the Soviets did huge nuclear bomb tests. The female polar bears today are able to reproduce and have cubs with them, but examination of the reproductive organs in the females shows that they are hermaphroditic and may have a vestigial penis in their vaginas, or external, in addition to having the female organs and being fertile.
This hermaphroditic issue of mixed sexes (masculinizing women and feminizing men) is now a global phenomenon. I think the whole “gay circus” is a cover for the serious issue of sex disturbances that are caused by nuclear pollution. It is not the fault of homosexuals, nor is it a personal choice in most cases. Our governments are deliberately allowing nuclear technologies that are sterilizing much of the population, or making it necessary to go to a hospital in order to get pregnant. A Canadian CSIS MD told me “wild reproduction for humans will soon not be possible without assisted medical treatment”... and this was also mentioned by Bertrand Russell. He said “we are planning to sterilize 95% of the male population and 65% of the female population. The fertile females will be expected to reproduce cannon fodder from the age of 20 to 40. This will give us a military advantage in winning wars.” This is in his book published in 1952 from his lectures at Cambridge/Oxford Univ. –
“Bertrand Russell was a “scientific consultant” to evil psychopaths who wanted to run a world tyranny. In this book, he lays out a framework for a “scientific” global dictatorship, and ponders the intricacies of bringing it about, while blithely penning his sociopathic rationalizations for moving forward with it.”
“In like manner, the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities, probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play…. All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called ‘co-operative,’ i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.” “It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished.” – p61 [3]“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.” – p62 [6]
“Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton. (The Aztecs kept a domesticated alien tribe for the purposes of cannibalism. Their regime was totalitarian)” – p63 [10]
Lovely of them to plan our lives for us…..
If you don’t believe me, then please explain to me how anyone could make this up!!

Recent Comments