On the Non-Profit Industrial Complex

11 05 2016

with Cory Morningstar

LINK – http://youtu.be/rYYVHiKbvRQ

2011 – The Climate Cartel: 1Sky, 350.org And Rockefeller Brothers | Stronger As One
By Cory Morningstar

Viral Vid about Volkswagon From GreenPeace SCRUBBED From You Tube!

7 07 2011


see the article here –

Jedi, we need your help. There has been a disturbance in the Force.

(it has it’s own links to download the cute video)

“Last night – at approximately 18:30 – our communications equipment took a direct hit. After providing nearly 2 million transmissions of our latest Rebellion underground message “VW: The Dark Side”, our YouTube films and channel were taken down. And now moments ago, Vimeo took them down. ” 

NOW! At 1:30 pm EST – London Debate on CO2 – GreenPeace vs George Monbiot

7 07 2011

Live webcast!



at    http://www.thereaction.net/events/y2011/nuclear_debate.aspx


best with IE browser —

Japan’s ocean radiation hits 7.5 million times legal limit[!!!]

5 04 2011

Story Here from the LA Times.

A ray of light – Greenpeace is there taking its own readings because TOPEC is so untrustworthy.

Followup on the radiation levels in Japan and the world at the Greenpeace International website –



There are tons of articles relating radiation readings in western US & Canada all the way across the mid-US and Canada to New England.  You can find them with Google News search term “radiation in jet stream“.

But don’t worry! Radiation in the rain and soil and sea is totally HARMLESS.

Global Research sets the record straight –

The government says there is no danger, as these levels (even levels in rainwater above drinking water standards) are “safe”. Specifically, they explain that the exposure is only short-term, while federal drinking water standards assume a constant level of radiation over the course of a year. . . .

Physicians for Social Responsibility notes:

According to the National Academy of Sciences, there are no safe doses of radiation. Decades of research show clearly that any dose of radiation increases an individual’s risk for the development of cancer.

“There is no safe level of radionuclide exposure, whether from food, water or other sources. Period,” said Jeff Patterson, DO, immediate past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility. “Exposure to radionuclides, such as iodine-131 and cesium-137, increases the incidence of cancer. For this reason, every effort must be taken to minimize the radionuclide content in food and water.”
Consuming food containing radionuclides is particularly dangerous. If an individual ingests or inhales a radioactive particle, it continues to irradiate the body as long as it remains radioactive and stays in the body,”said Alan H. Lockwood, MD, a member of the Board of Physicians for Social Responsibility. . . (more)


This Monday we notice the news media is goofing around again.

  • They are using the word “Meltdown” and hundreds of news headlines that are trivia, unrelated to the Japan-global catastrophe. This is obviously intended to defuse the story.
  • They are  dropping the story or moving it to the back burner.
  • They are spamming the leads with industry puff pieces promoting nuke power.
  • They repeat the corporate fiction that environmentalists back nuclear power. They ban discussion of carbon emmission pollution until now.
  • They aren’t fooling anyone.

Greenpeace Says Evacuation Area Near Fukushima Needs to be 20 km Wider

28 03 2011

From Greenpeace

Call to widen evacuation area around Fukushima

Blogpost by Brian Fitzgerald – March 27, 2011 at 19:40

Our team of radiation specialists in Japan brought back their findings for the day.
The press release says it all:

Fukushima, March 27, 2011:       Greenpeace radiation experts have confirmed radiation levels of up to ten micro Sieverts per hour in Iitate village, 40km northwest of the crisis-stricken Fukushima/Daiichi nuclear plant, and 20km beyond the official evacuation zone. These levels are high enough to require evacuation.

“It is clearly not safe for people to remain in Iitate, especially children and pregnant women, when it could mean receiving the maximum allowed annual dose of radiation in only a few days. When further contamination from possible ingestion or inhalation of radioactive particles is factored in, the risks are even higher.” . . . (more)


– The article has a link to more updated Twitter feed from them on the topic.