Canadian Nuke Puke in Denial Over Fukushima Radiation Harming Sea Life

22 01 2018

The coward who hides behind gag orders says “nothing to see here folks!”


Nuke Pro – a whale article compolition


Whole Earth Endangered by Mad Scientists, Jay Cullen, of Uranium U, and Ken Buesseler, of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Brave Explorer Who Called Them Out CONVICTED in Uranium-Friendly Canadian Court.

23 09 2016

A travesty of gigantic proportions. Evidently the bar in Canada has NO MAN among them as Dana could not obtain legal help for this urgent free speech case of importance to all humanity.



The Japan Times Canada activist found guilty of harassing scientists over Fukushima fallout

A Canadian environmental activist who waged a sustained online campaign against two prominent marine scientists was found guilty of criminal harassment by a court in Victoria, British Columbia, on Thursday.

The court heard that Dana Durnford, 54, threatened violence against Jay Cullen, of the University of Victoria, and Ken Buesseler, of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts, and accused them of underplaying the extent of damage to Pacific ecosystems from the 2011 Fukushima disaster.

Durnford was sentenced to three years’ probation. . . . (more)



Dana Durnford Arrested For Speaking His Mind. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute AND A University Get Him Arrested

Uranium U. and Unscrupulous Faux-Scientists Wish We Would Quit Talkin’ About Fukushima Radiation Hitting the Pacific Northwest. And They Wish Even More Dana Durnford Wasn’t a MAN but a little puffy kitten like THEM!

Ken Buesseler is looking for no answers on radiation contamination in the Pacific

Woods Hole Sh*ts in Pants — Scrubs Data on Pacific Radiation

Jay Cullen Kevorkian of Fukushima – Strontium Milks


Who is checking the NE Pacific for Fukushima radiation and who is not

No Free Speech in Canada: Professor with Nuclear-Uranium Mining-Govt Ties Has Disabled Man Arrested and Put in Jail


Academics Under the TEPCO Spell ($$$$)



Nuclear Meltdown: Releasing radiation and containing the truth

Mass Mortality among Rocky Shore Invertebrates across 100 km of Northeastern Pacific Coastline- Peer Reviewed Article

Fukushima: Impact Of Fallout On Oceans Part 1
Fukushima: Impact Of Fallout On Oceans Part 2


Nuke pro – a whale article compilation


Copy this post or resend it before this blog gets banned.


Nuke Puke Shock: Ken Buesseler walks back Fukushima radiation denial (!) … Jay Cullen still eats his own barf

14 07 2016

We were looking for Dana Durnford’s tormentors’ reaction to this undeniable new whiteRAD_yellRedevidence of Fukushima radiation impact on the North Pacific –
ENE -News“Like the plot of a summer horror flick”: All along Canada’s Pacific coast, mussels are dying… Bodies are swollen by cancerous tumors — Unprecedented mutations allowing cancer to spread from one species to another like a virus

Dana’s interview about it tells a worse scenario – the mussels are dying on the Atlantic AND Pacific sides of North America. [audio file]

KEN BUESSELER says – (fasten seat belts)
” . . . . the unprecedented dangers that Fukushima’s fallout posed to marine life: “More than eighty percent of the radioactivity from the damaged reactors [at Fukushima] ended up in the Pacific,” he said, “far more than reached the ocean from Chernobyl or Three Mile Island.”
From – (July 6) – Fukushima’s fallout: five years after the disaster
International research committee releases review covering five years of studies on nuclear radiation in the Pacific Ocean.

JAY CULLEN says – pinoccio

he is “Looking for #Fukushima Contamination in Canadian Coastal Waters” (umm-hmmm) – and then blames high rad readings on old, old weapons testing in the Pacific.


Academics Under the TEPCO Spell ($$$$)



27 04 2016

By Kate, Hounds of Fukushima
— (A reply to nuclear apologist, Jay Cullen)

All of your mathematical equations, at this point of the ongoing Fukushima release, are a complete waste of public moneys, and especially, our time. I am not a scientist, but I am a person of high intellect, and very well educated; as though any of that really matters… although I was given the gift of simple logic and common sense that many within the genius category seem to be missing. No personal connotations are intended, but if the shoe fits…

You are basing your studies on fraudulent information supplied by TEPCO, and other scientists, as well as deceitful nuclear PR persons; all controlled by the IAEA. Also, you are treating this study as though the large releases from Fukushima only occurred for a certain amount of time; as though they have this release under control now… Also fraudulent information. You have mentioned the process of “dilution,” which again, is not an accurate understanding of man-made radioactive isotopes that are constantly being released, as they do not dilute. They accumulate, the same as lead or mercury accumulates within the body, but unlike lead or mercury, they undergo fission, causing them to alter and become different isotopes; some that have longer lives, and become more deadly.

I am sorry, but while listening to and watching your video lecture, I half expected to hear you begin comparing this man-made background radiation to a banana. Forgive me for this expectation, but many of the studies you have referred to, and based your own on, were produced by Ken Beusseler who DOES fraudulently claim that this man-made radiation is of no more danger to us than the natural radiation in a banana.

I understand that the IAEA has been feeding nuclear scientists incorrect information about Fukushima since the beginning of this ongoing event, and although they have listened to the more accurate estimates of the Japanese that are NOT associated with TEPCO, they have a choke-hold of silence on ALL information being released to the public; this includes all earnest scientists associated with Universities as well as private study. I am sorry to pop your bubble, but this is a sad and sorry display of ultimate power and control in the name of their own heinous need to further their ulterior motive to continue their deadly nuclear program.

While you have had your nose buried in scientific problems and sums based on incorrect estimates provided on the Fukushima release, are you aware that the Cancer Treatment Centers of America has now changed the cancer statistics of 4.61 to 1,000 becoming ill with cancer, to 1 in 2 men, and 1 in 3 women? Are you even aware that the W.H.O. has recently made a public announcement that we will from now on, see a “tidal wave” of cancer? I appreciate their subtle choice of words in their description of the numbers to a “tsunami…”

Do these figures not alarm you in any way, to the fact that you may have been fed deliberate, inaccurate figures to base your studies on, or are you just another naive protégé of Ken Beussler?

pinoccioWhile I understand your tenacity in your field of research, and obvious need to mathematically equate sums which no longer have relevance to the urgency of the situation of this ongoing event, I ask you if it matters, really, how many bullets it takes to kill a person. Let me make the answer to this simple question very clear. One bullet into a person’s head will kill the same as 100 bullets. It’s the firing mechanism that needs to be dealt with now; not the amount of ammunition.

Your scientific jabber[to a group of layman] of mathematical equations is no longer an issue in this argument of the threat to our existence, and the urgency of the problem. The issue is that the release of radiation from the ONGOING spewing from Fukushima into our oceans and atmosphere are rapidly depleting our earth of life that is mandatory to the supply of oxygen that makes this planet hospitable to us; never mind the cancers resulting from these elements. Your studies from inaccurate figures are a waste of our resources and precious time. The focus now needs to be shifted from any scientific mathematical arguments, to the removal from power of those who would see the human race annihilated, so the choke-hold can be removed, and a proper scientific think-tank can be formed to figure out the solution to this ongoing release that is now, rapidly killing our planet.

I would ask you now, is it your preference to stay with your useless studies of figures, in the light of the real dangers of this issue, or would you not prefer to be a part of the scientific think-tank that we so desperately need, to rectify this event that threatens our existence on this beautiful planet we call home?

Please know that I am in no way belittling you as a scientist; we need you, and others in your field of expertise, as well as all the other fields; whether they be art, philosophy, medicine, law, etc., to make the human race whole… That is, if we survive this planetary event. If not, then none of this matters.

Let me now close my narrative with this logical, and self-searching compound question, followed with the final analysis of your choices in answering this question:

Q. Why do you think you were personally given the gift of the scientific mind that you very obviously do have; was it to be a part of saving the human race, or was it to be fooled into being a part of the annihilation of the human race?

If the honest answer you feel within yourself is the want and need to save, then I commend you, and hope you will become a part of doing just that.

If your inner answer is the latter, then I pity you.




Dana Asks Why Do Big Shot Scientists Make Pilgrimages to Chernobyl and Shun Fukushima? + Jay Cullen Antics

16 03 2016

You think these scientists know how to protect their own health but no one else’s?

Dana’s interview on – [AUDIO]

pinoccioJay “Tweety” Cullen doubling down on the nuke PR –
He extols this – ‘Acceptable risk’ is a better way to think about radiation exposure in Fukushima Written by a nuke stooge from Georgetown U.


Pacific 99% Dead From Fukushima

12 03 2016


Fukushima…Pacific Ocean 99% Dead…2015

LINK – < this video is one of hundreds banned from the account of hero reporter, Dana Durnford by evil goons at Woods Hole and Uranium U aka U Vic.



Dr.  –   Nuclear Disaster in Fukushima and Death of the Pacific Ocean

” . . . Much damage has already been done. “This is very amazing to me, having been working in the radioactive xenon monitoring field for about 17 years now. This was astounding to me… You can see background levels around 0.1 mBq/m3… Note the peak concentration we saw was in the range of 45,000 mBq/m3 — so that is 450,000 times our background level. For me that’s astounding. We never have ever seen anything even close to that. So the concentrations went up and up and up every day, and so that was quite amazing to see this 7,000 kilometers away from the event… I only show some of the data here . . . “


1of2birds_sm   |    2of2birds_sm


Reavealed: Why Jay Cullen and Ken Buesseler keep lying about Fukushima radiation harm

1 03 2016

Art treasure just discovered:



Uranium U’s Jay “Tweety” Cullen and Woods Hole’s ‘wholesome-radiation‘ poster boy, Ken Buesseler are getting ready to double down before the big 5th year anniversary of the Fukushima melt downs on 3-11.
The reprobates can’t quit the teat!


1of2birds_sm |  2of2birds_sm