Arizona Audit Released

25 09 2021

DRAFT -

Maricopa County Forensic Audit

The Gateway Pundit AZ Audit Finds Proof of Pre-Meditated Fraud: Multiple Ballot Envelopes Had “Verified and Approved” Stamp That Appears to be PRE-PRINTED BEHIND Signature Box – Several Approved With No Signature at All

San Francisco ChronicleAs Arizona election ‘audit’ ends, new ones begin

Critics point out the audit contractor is a fly-weight and doesn’t use standard vote audit methods.

23,000 MAIL IN BALLOTS VOTED FROM PRIOR ADDRESS & 5,000 POTENTIAL VOTERS WHO VOTED IN MULTIPLE COUNTIES
Experts said these claims are issues because Cyber Ninjas did not use the proper data sets. Benny White helped analyze election data for the Arizona Republican Party for the past 14 years. He said the auditors used commercially available data set that was not complete.

“The entire report by the Ninjas depends upon an analysis of this commercial database that I just don’t find credible. They depend on matching up voters by parts of names. Maybe the same year date of birth,” White said. “That’s just nonsense.”

https://www.12news.com/article/news/politics/verify-looking-into-some-of-the-arizona-audits-claims/75-63515a1a-1cbd-489f-bcb8-6906fe4e9729

Bev Harris explained in 2016 – ABOUT AUDITS

“Auditors assess whether conditions are present which may facilitate fraud. When auditors find material omissions, procedural flaws, or inaccuracies they may issue a “decline to state” opinion, explaining that facts cannot be substantiated.

An audit differs from a law enforcement investigation, and may be unable to determine for certain if material misrepresentations were actually made. It is beyond the scope of audits to determine whether inaccuracies were accidental or intentional. Determining criminality and proving whether or not there was theft is a law enforcement function, not an auditor’s role.”

 

 

SEE ALSO –  2020 Election Fraud – vote audits’ slow drip, drip, drip 💧