bin Laden Buried-at-Sea Because No-One-Would-Take-Him A LIE!

4 05 2011

Now this is one of the most idiotic lies to come out of this Pakistan assault story. The White House line goes they had to drag his body away real quick to give a proper Muslim “burial” at sea because no country wanted the body to be buried in their country. Not even counting the fact that shoving a corpse off side a ship like bait is not considered OK in the Arab world let’s look at one country that could take him. Saudi Arabia.

The bin Laden family has favored status there.

King Faud owns tons of properties including a

 private island! Azizia Island is 4 square miles and would have lots and lots of room for bullet riddled corpse.

King Faud is so taken with the bin Laden clan they enjoy exclusive construction contracts for the biggest religious sites in the Kingdom including refurbishing Mecca!  

From –  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/family.html :

Because the bin Laden company had the exclusive contract for repairs in the Holy Places, its trucks entered and left Mecca at all hours without being inspected. And the rebels used “bin Laden” trucks to get weapons into the city. One of the bin Laden sons, Mahrous, was actually arrested on account of his ties with the Islamists, but was later freed. He is currently manager of the group’s Medina branch.

The reason is as follows: after studies in England, where he had kept company with Fadli (son of the ex-sultan of the Abdin region in South Yemen, now leader of a Yemeni fundamentalist group and arrested in Aden last January), Mahrous struck up friendships with a group of Syrian Moslem Brothers in exile in Saudi Arabia. Subsequent Saudi intelligence investigations showed that these Moslem Brothers had taken advantage of Mahrous to use bin Laden trucks without his knowledge.

There was a touch of irony to the episode: when the insurrection broke out, the Saudi security services had to go for help to the bin Ladens, the sole parties in possession of maps of Mecca enabling the Saudi (and Western) police to find their way through the city’s underground passageways.

In any case, the episode also demonstrated the strength of the ties between the royal family and the bin Laden Group. Had it been some other group, there is no doubt that Mahrous–whether accomplice or patsy–would have been thrown into prison and the group barred from further economic activity in the kingdom, the sentence serving as a warning to others. This was not the case.

Likewise, the Saudi authorities’ decision to issue an arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden on 16 May 1993 does not threaten to affect the relationship between the bin Ladens and the royal family. Osama, one of Mohammed’s youngest son, has been known for years for his fundamentalist activities. …The arrest warrant was issued both because of his support for fundamentalist groups involved in terrorist operations in Algeria and Egypt and his ties with upstart religious circles that tried to establish an independent human rights organization in Saudi Arabia at the beginning of May.

Contrary to appearances, both the Osama and the Mahrous incidents testify to the bin Laden’s influence within the kingdom.

Here’s some more dirt –  http://nona-people.blogspot.com/2008/01/bin-laden-family.html

Is the reason the Bush Jr. won’t dance around the pyre at Ground Zero because he doesn’t want to offend the bin Laden family, the Saudi royal family and his crooked cronies in Saudi Arabian oil?

Another off shore locale where the (supposed) body of Osama bin Laden might rest is the bin Laden-friendly Cayman Islands. They had the tip-off on the 9-11 plot (cover for detonation) in AUGUST and didn’t relay it. . .


Anonymous Letter Warned of Bin Laden Attack


Statement by the Cayman Islands Government

http://www.guidetoaction.org/magazine/cayman.html


Note to FBI, CIA, “Homeland” Security Dept., NSA and all the other spooks – above research took less than 10 minutes.

The reason for dumping the body secretly was:

 A] It was someone else

B] The was no burial at sea – whole story a big lie.  

US soldiers get orders to keep quiet on missions for decades or forever after they get out of the service. Navy Seals still don’t talk about their participation in political kidnappings and assassinations in Viet Nam.





‘Israeli jets prepare in Iraq to strike Iran’

2 05 2011

‘Israeli jets prepare in Iraq to strike Iran’.

from CLG  





Wal-Mart: Our shoppers are ‘running out of money’

1 05 2011

Wal-Mart: Our shoppers are ‘running out of money’.

Do tell.

Maybe if they weren’t making WAL-MART WAGES they’d have some money for food!

Maybe if their local food store hadn’t been obliterated by WAL-MART they could WALK to the store in their (now destroyed) NEIGHBORHOOD.

Maybe if they had a UNION they could lobby for MASS TRANSIT for the benefit of all!

Maybe if WAL-MART PAID TAXES mass transit could be funded for FREE in cash strapped communities!

Maybe if WAL-MART and WAL-MART EXECS PAID TAXES communities wouldn’t be cash strapped!





Mutiny at the Afghan Air Corps

27 04 2011
Death toll of NATO casualties at shootout in Kabul airport rises to 9

KABUL, April 27 (Xinhua) — Death toll of NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) at shootout in Kabul airport on Wednesday reached nine, a statement of the military alliance released here said.

“Eight International Security Assistance Force service members and one ISAF civilian died following a shooting incident here today,” the statement confirmed.

However, it did not identify the nationalities of the victims, saying it is ISAF policy to defer casualty identification procedures to the relevant national authorities.

In the previous statement the alliance put the number of casualties suffered at the incident which happened at Afghan Air Corps at 11:00 a.m. local time just six soldiers.

Earlier, Afghan Defense Ministry confirmed in a statement that shootout between an Afghan pilot and his foreign colleagues at Afghan Air Corps which located in western part of Kabul airport left a number of people dead and injured.

Afghan Defense Ministry in the statement also noted that more details would be released after completion of investigation.

Meantime, Taliban militants fighting Afghan and NATO-led troops in Afghanistan claimed of responsibility, saying in the incident carried out by a Taliban loyalist nine foreign and five Afghan soldiers were killed.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-04/27/c_13848966.htm





Oil companies aiding Lybian ‘rebel’ force.

27 04 2011

From SCOOP

Khalifa Hifter, one of two rebel military commanders vying for the top command position over Free Libyan Forces in Libya, in his office at the Gulf Oil Co. in Benghazi on Tuesday.

The first concrete report of weapons from foreign donors reaching the Libyan rebels came Tuesday, but significantly, those 400 AK-47 rifles did not go through either of the two generals claiming to be the leader of the rebels’ forces. Instead, they went directly to a civilian, Fawzi Bukatef, a petroleum engineer who has been training other civilians and sending them to the front lines.


http://www.scoopit.co.nz/story.php?title=oil-companies-aiding-lybian-rebel-force-





Secret memos expose link between oil firms and invasion of Iraq

20 04 2011

From the [UK] Independent:

The minutes of a series of meetings between ministers and senior oil executives are at odds with the public denials of self-interest from oil companies and Western governments at the time.

The documents were not offered as evidence in the ongoing Chilcot Inquiry into the UK’s involvement in the Iraq war. In March 2003, just before Britain went to war, Shell denounced reports that it had held talks with Downing Street about Iraqi oil as “highly inaccurate”. BP denied that it had any “strategic interest” in Iraq, while Tony Blair described “the oil conspiracy theory” as “the most absurd”.

But documents from October and November the previous year paint a very different picture. . . . 

. . . . Five months before the March 2003 invasion, Baroness Symons, then the Trade Minister, told BP that the Government believed British energy firms should be given a share of Iraq’s enormous oil and gas reserves as a reward for Tony Blair’s military commitment to US plans for regime change. . . . 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/secret-memos-expose-link-between-oil-firms-and-invasion-of-iraq-2269610.html 





Why is the Fed Bailing Out Qaddafi? by Matt Taibbi

7 04 2011

Why is the Fed Bailing Out Qaddafi? by Matt Taibbi.

by Matt Taibbi
Rolling Stone
April 1, 2011

Barack Obama recently issued an executive order imposing a wave of sanctions against Libya, not only freezing Libyan assets, but barring Americans from having business dealings with Libyan banks.

So raise your hand if you knew that the United States has been extending billions of dollars in aid to Qaddafi and to the Central Bank of Libya, through a Libyan-owned subsidiary bank operating out of Bahrain. . . .

Reposted from Dandelion Salad.